So, I was hanging out over on
Ryan McGee's blog at Zap2It (because, you know, that is what internet pervs do
we hang out at blogs, cruising chicks electronically). And while I was there, I saw a post from someone named "I Like Kate."
Now, don't freak out, because I know right away you're saying to yourself, "She likes Kate? What is she, crazy?"
But it's cool. Trust me. One day I'll do a post on why Jack and Kate were purposely made to be so unlikeable, and then you'll go, "Oh, hey, well now I kind of like Kate, too. And maybe one day I'll even like Jack."
So anyway, ILK had a theory. Her theory (and it could be "his theory" or "Its theory," but I'm going with "her theory") was that Eloise Widmore (ne' Hawking) was, in fact, not worried about any sort of violation at all when she found out Desmond was waking up. ILK thought that Ellie had staged that whole kerfuffle with the guest list and Penny's name all for Desmond's benefit, in order to give him a little push.
So, let's think about that. Why would Ellie let her son get together with Charlie Pace in the first place if she were worried about "violations"? Why would she let her husband get involved with all of it, too, knowing full well that he may send his #1 fix-it man, Desmond David Hume, around to help out? And then, when Des did start poking his head into the guest list, why would Ellie then take him aside and say just enough to stir him up and peak his curiosity?
Well, she wouldn't. Not if she were really trying to keep a lid on everything.
But she would have done all of that if she wanted to push Desmond into fulfilling whatever his part of the equation just may be. And now that I think of it, so would Charles. And so would Daniel.
Were those three running a long con on Desmond in the Sideways World? Were they all working together to push Desmond into doing exactly what he is now doing?
Yeah, I think so, too.
I never bought Ellie as a Smokey accomplice, which is the popular theory that has been gathering steam out there in the ether. I thought
if anything maybe love of son might have caused her to decide to step out of the game once they got to the sideways universe and she found she had him back alive, but I did not really believe it. And,
as I reported below, no less than Damon and Carlton poo-pooed that idea in their podcast yesterday.
And I never bought that what we saw in
Happily Ever After proved that Widmore was "in the dark" about what was going on. He didn't show any hint of knowing anything, but the absence of proof is not proof itself of anything. And the decorations in Charles' office sure reeked of knowledge of something. They sure seemed designed to push someone's psychological buttons. And the whole spiel about having "no attachments, no entanglements, the perfect life" was just a little too on the nose, wasn't it? Now that this idea has hit me, all that little rap from Charles sounds like now is a carefully designed push for Desmond. It was Charles saying, "Remember when you did have a family, Desmond? And remember how much you loved it?"
The long con is a Lost staple. It was an episode title in S1, and it's been a thematic and dramatic staple that has recurred each and every season. Honestly, it is something we all should have been looking for when trying to figure out where this season was headed.
I think "I Like Kate" should start her own blog, or perhaps take over mine. Because I'm sold. This is one of those "I'll believe it until it's proven wrong" moments.
And, yeah, I like Kate. So what?